Daily Archives: June 22, 2011

Wal-Mart v. Dukes

On Monday(June 20th), the Supreme Court threw out the second biggest discrimination case this term. In this case, more than 1 million women are stating that Wal-Mart is discriminating against them due to their gender. The case was thrown out due to lack of evidence against Wal-Mart.
What seemed to have  happened was the courts did not allow the women to bring the case in a joint effort. Each woman would have to present their case on their own terms, which would have taken years. Some of these women would not be able to find the time or the money to present their case, so this is where the case begins to fall apart.  The women also did not present enough evidence to state that the company as a whole was discriminating against women.

Greek PM Survives Vote, Remains In Charge

In a vote of confidence on Tuesday, Greek Prime Minister George Papandreau was granted the opportunity to remain on as Prime Minister of the struggling nation. Greece, which was temporarily “saved” from unadulterated economic disaster by a sizable IMF-sponsored bailout which amounted to $157 billion. The dire economic straits in Greece has created ripples in Europe, as many European banks have a stake in the Greek economy (including but not limited to some of the biggest banks in France). In short, the Greek economy has become a toxic situation affecting other EU constituents, and, in turn, sending disrupting the stability of the global economy. According to CNN, the survival of Papndreau’s government, currently hanging on by a thread, provided a slight injection of confidence and market improvement in both Europe and the United States alike.

george-papandreou.gi.top.jpg

Greek PM George Papandreau narrowly survives, acquiring a vote of confidence on Tuesday that gives the Greek nation and foreign investors a brief moment of respite from the economic troubles in Greece.

 

Many are predicting a second round of bailouts for the small nation, but any further significant assistance from foreign lending entities will have to come with certain concessions from the Greek government. For one, Greece will have enact “austerity measures” to make up for the national deficit that has been irresponsibly accumulated, a point which includes the sale of government assets to raise money and contribute to pushing the debt back down. Additionally, general spending cuts will have to be made. Despite the perils involved, the situation comes down to very simple concept: Greece must spend less than they take in, much like a person attempting to lose weight must burn more calories than they consume. These aforementioned measures will have to be put into place before the Greek nation will see any resumption of foreign pecuniary assistance, as many investors have become gun-shy as the collapse of the Greek economy seems to only have been delayed by last year’s bailout funds.

Unfortunately for the Papandreau government, violent demonstrations have raged on as the increase in taxes and unemployment have fomented an intense dissatisfaction amongst the Greek populace. Protestors attacked the Finance Ministry, leading to a police crackdown via tear gas. Even if Papandreau does all the things necessary to beat back the deficit hanging around the Greek nation’s neck like an albatross, he could and likely still will be the bad guy in the eyes of his people. Sadly, for Greece and other nations facing deficit problems (including our very own), the only way to get back to normalcy–regardless of whomever caused the economic troubles in the first place–is to accept that sacrifices will have to be made and that things will get worse before they get better.

Contains information from CNNMoney.

Afghanistan Troop “Surge” Coming to An End?

President Obama is due to make a much-anticipated speech on Wednesday that will potentially change many aspects of American life. Obama is expected to announce the removal of troops from Afghanistan in numbers that greatly exceed what some military personnel have called for; Obama plans to pull approximately 10,000 troops in 2011 and a whooping 30,000 in 2012 in stark opposition to the 3,000-5,000 that Defense Secretary Robert Gates suggested for 2011. There are approximately 100,000 troops currently serving in Afghanistan, with a sizable 30% of them coming from the 2009 “surge.”

Rhetoric like this has been put forth before by the White House and hasn’t come to fruition. In fact, one of Obama’s biggest promises from the 2008 campaign was a proposed immediate wholesale withdrawal of troops. However, this time is apparently different. Secretary Gates acknowledged that the nation is “tired” after so many years in the military quagmire that is Afghanistan, with seemingly little to no improvement in the nation (outside of the killing of Osama bin Laden). According to an official statement by White House Press Secretary Jay Carney:

[Obama] will make his decision based on the need to succeed further in achieving those objectives and to transfer authority gradually, security authority, over to the Afghan national security forces, with an eye to the fact that, as agreed to by NATO in Lisbon, we will eventually transfer full security lead over to the ANSF (Afghan National Security Forces) in 2014.

The popular desire to pull troops up has risen dramatically as recently as May. Even Republicans, who have been the biggest proponents of the war effort, have slightly changed their collective tune, with more of them calling for troop withdrawals. With the 2012 Presidential race right around the corner, it is certainly not cynical to opine that this might be an attempt to rally support for his [Obama's] re-election bid. But, if Obama follows through on what he plans to announce on Wednesday, it will be a historic day for the United States. Sons and daughters will get their fathers and mothers back and wives will get their husbands back. The $2 billion a week expenditure in the war effort in Afghanistan will either be pocketed or spent on a domestic point of interest in an attempt to revitalize a flailing economy that isn’t getting up as quickly as expected or hoped for. While the prospects of a post-United States presence Afghanistan seem grim and absent of reasons to be optimistic, troop withdrawals, just like in Vietnam, is the only option. President Obama will speak, but eventually he will have to follow through and bring the troops home.

 

Contains information from CNN.

 

51-year-old “Green Mile” Star Marries 16-year-old

51-year-old Doug Hutchison recently wed 16-year-old Courtney Alexis Stodden on May 20, making the age gap between the couple 35 years. Hutchison is well known for his roles in films such as “The Green Mile” and shows such as “Lost” and “24”, while Stodden is an aspiring country singer. The couple met through Stodden’s signing to Hutchison’s production company.

 

Doug Hutchison and Courtney Alexis Stodden 'happily' live together in their Hollywood Hills home.The news of the couple’s marriage is appearing in news blogs a full month after the ceremony, leading some to believe something fishy may be going on between the two. However, Hutchison has released a statement claiming that they are not blind to the fact that “our vast age difference is extremely controversial…but we’re very much in love and want to get the message out there that true love can be ageless.”

 

The fact that Stodden is only 16 years of age indicates that her parents had to have given consent since she is a minor, and in the state of Nevada, one must be at least 18 years old to obtain a marriage license without parental consent. Her mother and father have released statements saying “we are totally supportive of this marriage” and  “Doug is the nicest man I’ve ever met in my life”.

Contains information from ABC News.